 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uQhXg-0000CcC; Mon, 3 Jun 96 16:52 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 3 Jun 1996 13:12:42 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"-7Ece.0._WC.2wrin"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 17: |
14:17 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What about a product called Unicam?
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Graphicode vs. Advanced CAM Technologies
Author: [log in to unmask] at Internet
Date: 6/3/96 3:15 PM
>Message was resent -- Original recipients were:
To: "'IPC TechNet'"
<[log in to unmask]>--------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
We are currently using Graphicode's GC-CAM (dos) and are evaluating =
ACT's Ecam-II (windows) product. I am looking for opinions, preferably =
comparative, on these two products.
Thanks
|
|
|
