TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Sun, 02 Jun 1996 20:23:55 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4484
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uQPC5-0000CaC; Sun, 2 Jun 96 21:16 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"iraAQ.0.8HG.0iain"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Lyle Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
X-Info:
SISNA
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 17:
05:44 1996
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
At 06:11 PM 6/2/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Any opinions concerning Plotting and darkroom films for pcb 
>manufacturing?
>Which do you prefer
>Any comparisons between Kodak and Agfa?
>Line edge , Stability , Scratch resistance 
>opinions greatfully accepted.
>Thanks
> John Gibson J.A.G. Imaging Systems
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
We evaluated darkroom films about 8 months ago and the line edge acuity
(fringing) of the Kodak films was superior to the other films. 

Lyle Anderson
Electrostar-Utah
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2