 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uPZ2c-0000CmC; Fri, 31 May 96 13:35 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 31 May 1996 11:41:30 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"eFx6X2.0.VUI.blphn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 16: |
21:05 1996 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Message-ID: |
<01BB4EE6.41667960@JOHNP> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are currently using Graphicode's GC-CAM (dos) and are evaluating ACT's Ecam-II (windows) product. I am looking for opinions, preferably comparative, on these two products.
Thanks
|
|
|
