TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uPVRm-0000EcC; Fri, 31 May 96 09:45 CDT
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 16:
18:40 1996
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 31 May 1996 07:18 PST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4461
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"lqYTS.0.ltD.jNmhn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Sherman Banks)
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
We are preparing to begin production of BGA assemblies. Approximately 
1000 per month with one 256 pin PBGA per assembly. We would like to use a 
bench-top transmissive x-ray unit for process development and control. We 
are having difficulty justifying this to our management. Can anyone 
relate their experience in developing a similar process WITHOUT on-site 
x-ray inspection??


Sherman Banks
Trimble Navigation
408/481-6047

[log in to unmask]




ATOM RSS1 RSS2