TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uPT8Z-0000CBC; Fri, 31 May 96 07:17 CDT
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 16:
15:47 1996
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 31 May 1996 08:15:40 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1750
TO:
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"WotPy.0.msI.-Ckhn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
X-Sun-Charset:
US-ASCII
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)

 TOM..
      I totally agree with you. You do have an assembly drawing that gives
  you the reference designation of a part and on a production job, with all
  the automation and transfer of information from a common database,
  who cares!!!  In many cases, especially with high density SMT assembilies,
  you cannot put the ref des anywhere near the part, which only adds to the
  confusing. The MIL-STD IEEE Std 200 para 8.1, states that ref des must be 
  on the PWB except: "Where space limitations preclude such marking".
     That being said, our circuit engineers, inspection and test/rework
  communities use them extensivly during the prototype/pre-production phase
  of a job and I would attempt to please them. Once passed that, I would 
  delete them.            
                                              Regards,
                                                        Bob Vanech     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2