TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uP8lx-00008RC; Thu, 30 May 96 09:32 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 30 May 1996 10:38:29 +0400 (EDT)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4427
TO:
"Michael J. Chmela" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Cssoo3.0._qB.p5Rhn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 16:
04:10 1996
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
cc:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (38 lines)
Michael, I have no experience and 2 ideas:
1)  Use a higher temperature solder for the aluminum-teflon interface 
than that used to attach components;
2)  Use one of those Metcal soldering irons which have RF heated tips and 
don't get hotter than the solder melt temperature to attache components.
Lou Hart  


.

On Wed, 29 May 1996, Michael J. Chmela wrote:

> Hello all:
> Do any of you have experience in automated soldering of SMT parts onto teflon
> type PCBs already soldered to an aluminum carrier?
> 
> The PCB is either a Rogers RO3006 or Arlon EPSILAM-10 material that is reflowed 
> to a tin plated aluminum carrier (up to .5"x15"x15") using solder paste. 
>  The configuration is reflowed under clamping pressure to prevent voids between
>  the PCB and carrier. Afterwards, the SMT parts are soldered by hand.  This 
> process was choosen as a
> less costly method than procuring the PCB already attached to the carrier
> material and subsequently machined.
> 
> The question is, how do we keep the soldered interface (PCB/carrier) intact
> while the SMT parts are reflowed?  My concern is that if we switch to a higher
> temp solder for the interface to solve this problem, we will have problems with
>  the PCB material after being exposed to that extreme temp. and
> have problems with the oven at those elevated temps.  Cooling will also be a
> problem, because of the mass. 
> 
> Any comments from anyone with experience on this would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2