TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uORGY-0000EYC; Tue, 28 May 96 11:05 CDT
Encoding:
7 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 28 May 96 08:52:25 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4371
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 11:
40:15 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Dx2wY2.0.NWJ.fGogn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
     
     Does anyone have any data regarding the bond strength suface mount 
     test listed in Table 18 of IPC-RB-276.  Aren't we testing peel 
     strength which has already been tested at the raw material level?
     Thanks for your attention.
     [log in to unmask]
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2