TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 28 May 96 09:48 CDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4366
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 11:
38:56 1996
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ln0Qs1.0.fjG.z2ngn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Paresh Patel <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uOPyI-0000D5C; Tue, 28 May 96 09:42 CDT
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Good morning TechNeters,

Wellcome back to work.

We are considering to purchase Multitroniks MX 920 Cut & Clinch System to
replace hand insertion.  MX 920 used to be Regan, if that's the name you know.

I visited  a manufacturing firm who is using, not the same, but a similar
system for hand insertion.  The performance was impressive.

If you are using MX 920 or any similar system, would you please reply with
your opinion as far as performance, capacity, maintanance, training, set-up
time, ease of using, defect rate, advantages, dis-advantages, etc....

Thanks in advance,
Paresh.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2