TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uOP6K-0000E7C; Tue, 28 May 96 08:46 CDT
Encoding:
22 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 28 May 96 08:50:44 cst
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4362
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 11:
38:34 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"N4SGy3.0.q-9.hEmgn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"ddhillma" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
     Having silk screen ink on the surface mount pads is ok if you don't 
     intend on having solder joints on those pads! The silk screen ink will 
     interfere the formation of the solder joint and give you questionable 
     solder joint reproducibility.
     
     Dave Hillman
     Rockwell Collins
     [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FAB:  Silk-screen ink on surface mount pads
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    5/28/96 8:01 AM


Recently I have seen PC boards with silk screen ink on surface mount 
pads.  Is any of this allowed?  Looking at the PC board IPC standards, I 
don't see this subject addressed.  May I have some guidance?  
Lou Hart   412-858-6117
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2