TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uN48y-0000C4C; Fri, 24 May 96 16:11 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 24 May 96 14:02:00 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4345
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 11:
31:38 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"rNTu72.0.48K.3OYfn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
     We've tried this a few times and found that w/normal use that a 
     corrosion product forms that leads to increased 
     resistance/intermittent opens.  We don't allow tinned parts in 
     sockets.
     
     Jim Maguire
     Boeing 
     (206)657-9063


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: assy:compatability gold vs tin/lead
Author:  [log in to unmask] at esdigate
Date:    5/22/96 9:07 AM


     
We have instances where tin/lead coated pins are inserted into gold plated 
sockets, etc.  Components even have gold/tin-lead or gold/tin interfaces, 
such as an IC socket with a gold contact with a tin sleeve.  Mil-Std-889B 
indicates gold as being incompatable with tin or tin/lead.  Has anyone 
looked into this issue and is there a potential for corrosion formation and 
associated problems?  Again, I just refereing to mechanical contact ( not 
soldering ).
     
Thanks,
Jack Tippit
Wilcox Electric
[log in to unmask] 
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2