 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uMKGb-0000D8C; Wed, 22 May 96 15:12 CDT |
| Sender: |
|
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 22 May 96 19:52:01 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 4 18: |
02:10 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Posted: |
Wed, 22 May 96 19:57:01 -0400 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"c5vWT2.0.y_E.aKten"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Msg-Class: |
ALL-IN-1 IOS Server for VMS V3.0 PBL123A (US) ENGLISH 21-MAR-1992 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
<20506122506991/188181@ALLIN1> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
OK, now you long winded authors can start typing. I'm looking for opinions on
the reliability differences between negative and positive etchbach. What is
typical, standard, recommended, preferred? We are using a 8 layer polyimide
board.
Thanks in advance,
Jim Marsico
(516) 595-5879
[log in to unmask]
********************************
* ______ _ _ _____ *
* / ___ | | | | | _____ *
* / /___| | | | | | _____ *
* __/ ____ | | | | |______ *
* |____/ |_| |_| |________| *
* *
* SYSTEMS, INC. *
********************************
|
|
|
