 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uMDOh-0000CSC; Wed, 22 May 96 07:52 CDT |
| Encoding: |
33 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 22 May 96 07:57:00 CDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"dYQAu1.0.A8F.-tmen"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 4 17: |
57:38 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In the experiments that we have done on wave soldering the omega wave has
shown little significance in the reduction of solder defects. The main
factors that have stood out to us are 1. the spray fluxer nozzel size, 2.
spray fluxer pressure, 3. conveyor angle, 4. topside board temperature, 5.
solder bath temperature 6. turbulent wave, 7. dwell time.
I have seen the omega wave help reduce out gassing but I have no data to
back that up.
----------
From: TechNet-request
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: OMEGA WAVE
Date: Tuesday, May 21, 1996 16:30
GREETING FORM BLUE SMURF
Question:
What is the main function(s) of "OMEGA wave" in wave soldering?
A. Eliminate excessive solder,
B. Product extra thrust in the entrance region,
C. Reduce air trapped under board
D. All of the above
E. Other
Question:
Is there any paper, data, or DOE outthere to backup these findings?
Thanks for your response
|
|
|
