Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uLw8s-0000CBC; Tue, 21 May 96 13:26 CDT |
Encoding: |
26 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 96 14:31:29 CST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Cc: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<DesignerCouncil-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"1EEVS.0.Ku6.ahWen"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 4 17: |
51:11 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
People,
I don't see in his original message anything that shows he
is working with something "physical". His message says he's
working with a "calculation". The raw answer for his
question is - NO. When using calculations for Microstrip
and Stripline, the value for the dielectric is the same.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Controlled Impedance - Dielectric Constant
Author: [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
Date: 5/21/96 8:15 AM
Subject: Controlled Impedance - Dielectric Constant
I like to know if anyone found that Dielectric Constant, for the same
material (e.g. FR-4),
might be different when used for calculation of Microstrip or for
calculation of Stripline.
Avner Drory
|
|
|