TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uLw8s-0000CBC; Tue, 21 May 96 13:26 CDT
Encoding:
26 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 21 May 96 14:31:29 CST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1736
TO:
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"1EEVS.0.Ku6.ahWen"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 4 17:
51:11 1996
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
          
          People,
          
          I don't see in his original message anything that shows he 
          is working with something "physical".  His message says he's 
          working with a "calculation".  The raw answer for his 
          question is - NO.  When using calculations for Microstrip 
          and Stripline, the value for the dielectric is the same.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Controlled Impedance - Dielectric Constant
Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
Date:    5/21/96 8:15 AM


          
Subject: Controlled Impedance - Dielectric Constant
          
I like to know if anyone found that Dielectric Constant, for the same 
material (e.g. FR-4),
 might be different when used for calculation of Microstrip or for
calculation of Stripline.
          
Avner Drory 
          



ATOM RSS1 RSS2