TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tfCfL-0000PFC; Wed, 24 Jan 96 15:23 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 96 12:58:32 PST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2348
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"f_INK.0.ep9.MDg1n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"dmitchel" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 31 10:
18:39 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
 contact your local pcb chemistry rep's for samples of the first part of 
 their two part solder strippers. they typically leave the copper/tin 
 intermetallics behind. don't know what to expect with gold.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Sn-Pb etch
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    1/24/96 10:58 AM


Can anyone recommend a method to completely remove the 63-37 solder from a 
surface, leaving the underlying intermetallics untouched?   I have tried 
hydrochloric acid; it works for solder reflowed on Cu, but in joints with 
gold it apparently re-precipitates gold artifacts.  Any help would be 
greatly appreciated.
 
Edwin Bradley
Motorola
 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2