 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tf8DB-0000PAC; Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:38 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 1996 10:41:27 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jan 30 10: |
34:40 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Uc6_x2.0.BIA.s1c1n"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
.int [log in to unmask]
For a good paper see http://www.amp.com/product/articles/dd68_1.html
on the web, Per the Tin Commandments:
"Mating tin-plated contacts to gold-plated contacts is not recommended."
I have this situation on my home computer and sure enuf, after a yaer
I had to re-seat the sims!
Larry Sternig
[log in to unmask]
*** Original Author: ipc.ipc.org!ipc.org! 01/24/96 071745
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 05:04:36 -0800
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Terry Davey" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Mating Au-Ni with Sn-Pb connectors
Cc: turnerj@prut
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Resent-Message-ID: <"MF_-J.0.CdE.UtY1n"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2324
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Does anyone out there have experience/knowledge of mating gold-plate edge
contacts (on SIMMS - so dry contacts) with tinned connectors. Is it a no-no
from a long-term reliability point of view?
We have a first source with tinned edge contacts (matching the connector) and
are lokking at a gold-plate second source.
Terry Davey [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
