 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uHwPS-0000C8C; Fri, 10 May 96 12:55 CDT |
| Sender: |
<EPPERSON@[138.32.59.15]> |
| CC: |
|
| Old-Return-Path: |
<simon.ipc.org!nntp.onramp.net!efw![138.32.59.15]!EPPERSON> |
| Date: |
Fri, 10 May 1996 12:54:12 +0000 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| Priority: |
normal |
| TO: |
|
| X-Confirm-Reading-To: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"hE7Gi2.0.xqJ.9Cuan"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 19: |
54:28 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-mailer: |
Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.22) |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Suzanne,
I agree with Tom Carroll's (Hughes Aircraft) response. However, I would like
to add the following comment (two cents worth):
"Design induced" defects would be hidden from your trend
analysis data base if you elected not to document wave solder defects
prior to rework. e.g., Poor PTH to lead diameter ratio causing
insufficent solder would be masked by the undocumented rework.
Remember, the primary purpose of all defect recording should be to
identify the root cause whether it be workmanship, materials, or design.
By the way, I am elated to see someone else who is also working
to convert MIL-STD-2000A requirements to J-STD-001 or IPC-A-610.
We are currently preparing a contract block change request to convert our
MIL-Q-9858A Quality System requirements to ISO 9001. Conversion of
MIL-STD-2000A contractual requirements is next on my agenda. I would
like to here from anyone who is interested in sharing information on this process.
Sincerely,
Dan
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
