 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uHtGf-0000DEC; Fri, 10 May 96 09:34 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 10 May 1996 10:40:09 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"rYqLl3.0.g0A.RFran"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 19: |
38:17 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve,
You might want to check out EIA-625 for ESD handling considerations. The IPC
ESD committee recommended that document and its wording for ESD provisions in
IPC specifications.
Also be aware that the DoD has requested that the EOS/ESD Association (Rome,
NY) undertake a re-write of MIL-STD-1686 and MIL-HDBK-263. This effort is
scheduled later this summer.
Doug Pauls
CSL
ESD TG Chair
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
