 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tf6j7-0000PFC; Wed, 24 Jan 96 09:03 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 1996 09:09:03 -0600 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jan 30 10: |
24:41 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-id: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"9qole1.0.us6.iea1n"@ipc> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Would anyone who happens to be an electrical test guru provide the
relative efficiency of bare board electrical test and compare a "standard"
electrical test to a "net list test". The impetus for this is our in-circuit test
department wondering why they occasionally still find opens and shorts
on "tested" boards. All responses and opinions greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Bob Hoene
Marquette Electronics
Milwaukee, WI
|
|
|
