 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uHciB-0000YcC; Thu, 9 May 96 15:53 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
| Date: |
Thu, 9 May 1996 15:53:18 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"gXUvj.0.wU9.2jban"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 19: |
22:49 1996 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9605091535.A58126-0100000@ipc> |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve:
I recommend that you refer to IPC-SM-786A, for specific handling
issues. It does not, however, go into much detail about the broader issue
of the plant itself.
The 786A refers to MIL-STD-1686 for ESD control. Potential health concerns
(if any) could probably addressed in the IPC forum [log in to unmask]
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062
P: 847-509-9700, ext. 335
F: 847-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
On Thu, 9 May 1996, Steve Quinn wrote:
> Hello out there.
>
> We are looking into the handling of our humidity sensitive parts.
> We currently keep them in their sealed bags, and reseal unused parts
> immediately after a build(we build very low volumes of boards per day). We
> are considering controlling the environment in the room where we build, and
> keeping the humidity under 30% to eliminate any moisture build up in the
> parts. Do I run into other problems, such as ESD issues, and how can I deal
> with those? Are there health concerns from running in too dry an
> environment? Any comments would be appreciated.
> Thanks.
>
> Steve Quinn
> Heurikon Corp
>
>
|
|
|
