TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uHXT4-0000SUC; Thu, 9 May 96 10:17 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
9 May 1996 09:48:09 U
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3987
TO:
"ipc technet" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"sOvzL.0.vMA.5oWan"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Nachbor Suzanne" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 19:
02:11 1996
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
Mail*Link SMTP-MS 3.0.2
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
We are reviewing converting Mil-Std-2000A and some old 454 contracts to the
J-std-001.  Also all new contracts would require this spec.  We have a team of
8 people from different facets within our organization looking at a matrix of
differences as well as questions of intepretations.  

I would like some input on defect observation from people in industry.  If you
work in a work cell environment with TQC checks and someone in the work cell
catches a defect do you count that defect or do you count it when it is
discovered in the next work cell.  An example would be at the wave solder
machine how do people feel about the acceptability that hand touchup done
within the wave solder cell without recording it as rework is permitted?  I
guess we're expanding our debate outside of our 8 person team and would like
your input.

Thanks, Suzanne Nachbor
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2