TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uHLkE-0000C9C; Wed, 8 May 96 21:46 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 8 May 1996 22:52:30 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3965
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"U91sQ1.0.wzH.znLan"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 18:
47:55 1996
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I wasn't going to get involved in this mess, I was going to observe and
delete, but after reading this last message I find I can refrain no more:

1.  I found the apology genuine and sincere.  Bravo!!

2.  Did you really read his entire posting?? He wrote;
"And finally, to those who sent email reminiscent of 
vigilante = self-proclaimed lords of the net,...grow up."

I see nothing wrong with telling those, who would send such e-mail messages,
to grow up, and even "get a life".

Adam Davies
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2