 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uGu0K-0000OaC; Tue, 7 May 96 16:09 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 7 May 1996 17:15:09 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"j1dy13.0.d_H.nlxZn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 17: |
56:18 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Monsieur Jaquet,
I, for one, appreciate YOUR comment regarding Technet and its contents.
I agree with you about the knowledge gained.
It is flattering for a company as advanced as yours and as willing as yours
to try new technologies, e.g., electrodeposit resist to state that you learn
from the "net".
I also agree with your comments on those that wish to be removed from the
list.
Have a great 1996!!
Gene H. Weiner
|
|
|
