Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u2n8d-0000FvC; Fri, 29 Mar 96 16:59 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 96 11:45:36 PST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"98ACB.0.wC9.8j6Nn"@ipc> |
From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 3 16: |
37:23 1996 |
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Cc: |
|
Subject: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Fred, Michael,
I was interested in your communique, because I too am designing motor/valve
drivers that are switching large powers where inductive impedences are a
concern. What type of reflow do you all use? Are we the only folks left who
use vapor reflow? I've heard that it is not common. I too am mildly skeptical
about the rules for traces egressing an SMD land and if this would be a sig-
nificant cause for uneven solder cooling of opposing lands. Since, during
vapor phase, there is a pre-heat 'ramp-up', the entire PCA should have a fairly
uniform temperature, no? And there is a cool-down phase as well.
(I will query our assy people).
One note about the SMD components on my hi-current nets; not all of the
components are necessarilly seeing hi-current. As a rule of thumb, I've
noticed that the smaller packages (having smaller lands) on a hi-current signal
net generally are'nt seeing the hi-current anyway; such as the control side
of my switch where there are voltage dividers and maybe a suppressor diode
that will only see transient spikes when the motor fields collapse or res-
istors to testpoints on my buss voltage. So I just keep those traces smaller
anyway. Maybe this is obvious, but I thought I would just throw this out
there. Stay active with this forum with these types of designs so I can pick
your brains. Thanks.
James Patten
TRW Space and Electronics Group
(310) 813-8914
|
|
|