DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u2J7Z-000083C; Thu, 28 Mar 96 08:56 CST
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Mar 96 09:08:18 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1510
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"42CDJ.0.4FE.GYgMn"@ipc>
Subject:
THERMAL MASS IN SMD REFLOW PROCESS
From:
[log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 28 11:
37:49 1996
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
QUESTION, PORTIONS OF A SMD PCB DESIGN ARE SWITCHING VOLTAGE CONVERTERS AND 
RECOMMENDED LAYOUT CALLS FOR MASSIVE COPPER TRACES TO MINIMIZE INDUCTANCE. 
THE REST OF THE PCB IS NORMAL SMD USING TRACE NARROWING PER RECOMENDATIONS 
IN IPC-SM-782 SECTION 3.6.2.2 . MY QUESTION IS WETHER THIS WILL CAUSE 
PROBLEMS DURING REFLOW DUE TO DIFFERING THERMAL MASS ACROSS THE PCB?


[log in to unmask]
(412) 688-2410

ATOM RSS1 RSS2