DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u1IaF-00007SC; Mon, 25 Mar 96 14:09 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 25 Mar 1996 15:13:04 -0500
Precedence:
list
X-Sun-Charset:
US-ASCII
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1474
TO:
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"d4uNj1.0.1sG.6slLn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Louis Dallara)
From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 25 17:
43:29 1996
Resent-From:
Cc:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Hi Guy's;
There was an article in EE Times 2 weeks ago, The IPC was quoted, only
30 designer's have passed out of the 100 that have taken the test.
They are going to revamp it. I hope they get the designer's input's.
Louis T. Dallara	
Printed Circuit Designer 
[log in to unmask]
http://www.waterw.com/~ldallara/index.html
> 
> 
> >>> Dave Schmitz <[log in to unmask]> 03/25/96 12:46pm wrote
> >>>
> ---cut---
> >>>The Problem I see now is everyone I talk to thinks the whole
> certification process is a JOKE ..... I really think this programs going no
> where.
> ---cut---
> 
> IMHO I wholeheartly agree
> 
> Tom 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>               
> 
> 
> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2