Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 1997 22:29:44 -0500 (EST) |
From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 7 09: |
32:02 1997 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<DesignerCouncil-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"PUVkf1.0.7OH.hbu7p"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0w2qCa-000BBqC; Thu, 6 Mar 97 21:20 CST |
X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Many thanks to Jeff and Gary for catching the discrepancy and passing the
corrected information along to all.---John
At 10:32 AM 3/6/97 -0600, you wrote:
>I'm not with IPC but I have in front of me IPC-SM-782A Amendment 1 which
>was recently released ... There was a correction to IPC-SM-782A section
>3.6.2.2 stating a width and length for the necked-down area of 0.25mm
>(0.010") and 0.50mm (0.020") respectively.
>
>As Gary mentioned, I have also _heard_ "the trace should not be larger than
>50% of the pad width" but I don't remember ever seeing that in print by
>anyone.
>
>-Jeff-
>
>At 06:37 AM 3/6/97 -0600, Tomas Garman wrote:
>>John;
>>
>>Your reference is correct, but I believe it is a typo in IPC-SM-782.
>>.025mm would be .001in the statement in 782 is "Maximum conductor width
>>should be .025mm [.010in]"
>>
>>Would someone from IPC like to clarify? I believe the .010in figure is
>>closer to reality.
>>
>>Regards
>>Tom G.
>>
>>On Mar 6, 6:16am, john balchunas wrote:
>>> Subject: Re: SMTTraces
>>> >Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 09:02:11
>>> >To: [log in to unmask] (Mike Modrzejewski)
>>> >From: john balchunas <[log in to unmask]>
>>> >Subject: Re: SMTTraces
>>> >
>>> >Hello Mike, I came across the following info in Surface Mount Design and
>>> Land Pattern standard IPC-SM-782A section 3.6.2.2..."Wide conductors
>>> connecting to a land area can act as a solder thief...Narrow the conductor
>>> as it enters the land area. Maximum conductor width should be .025
>>> mm....The minimum conductor length should be .025 mm." Hope this helps!
>> John
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >At 06:54 AM 3/4/97 CST, you wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>Hi my name is Michael Modrzejewski
>>> >>Iam looking for some information on trace width going into SMT pads.
>>> >>Is there any problems with a .025 trace going into a 1206,0805 or 0603
>pads
>>?
>>> >>IS there a rule of thumb for this ?
>>> >>
>>> >>MOJO
>>>-- End of excerpt from john balchunas
>>--
>>Tom Garman KC4WAR
>>PCB Designer and Librarian
>>Sacred cows make the best hamburger (stolen from a friend)
>>Don't force it, get a bigger hammer.
>>
>
>
>+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
>| Jeff Foster [log in to unmask] |
>| Engineering Assistant |
>| Broadcast Electronics, Inc. http://www.bdcast.com |
>+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
>
>
***************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.*
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the DesignerCouncil, please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|