DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0v5GlR-0000RfC; Mon, 23 Sep 96 14:33 CDT
Encoding:
5 TEXT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Sep 1996 12:40:59 -0700
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2063
TO:
"'IPC'" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"FYjfH.0.daJ.ZOkHo"@ipc>
Subject:
PCB Design Reliability - SMD vs. Through hole
From:
Ed Current <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Mon Sep 23 17:
55:13 1996
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
I realize this is a VERY general question but....
	My boss and I were discussing design reliability, when we realized that 
although we both have heard for years the SMT resulted in more reliable 
boards, neither could recall seeing a written confirmation of this. Can 
anyone help?

****************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05      *
**************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:            *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
****************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2