DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uZnRd-0000CiC; Fri, 28 Jun 96 18:59 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jun 96 17:05:00 PDT
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 3 08:
28:36 1996
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<Fri, 28 Jun 96 17:07:00 [log in to unmask]>
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1806
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Z5U1f2.0.TKB.S77rn"@ipc>
Subject:
Re[2]: 4-layer vs 6-layer
From:
Stephen C Joy <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
cc:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Why is a 6 layer board better than a 4 layer board? 


If this board is large qty prod. or well-defined (meaning it's been through a
revision or is basically known circuitry) then the decision to go to 4 layers
might be a consideration - but the 6 layer would be a better choice from the
quality standpoint - Here's where we all talk about "the cost of quality"...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2