DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uYHGS-0000CdC; Mon, 24 Jun 96 14:25 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CC:
References:
Date:
Mon, 24 Jun 1996 12:32:57 -0700
Precedence:
list
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jun 24 14:
40:07 1996
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1789
TO:
Fred Pescitelli <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-From:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ScXX13.0.FpH.lkkpn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Old-Return-Path:
Message-ID:
Organization:
Circuit Packaging and Layout
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Fred Pescitelli wrote:
> Has anybody been using SMT Plus land patterns? They are advertising a lib.
> for P-Cad. How do they compare to the IPC 782 Patterns?
> Jim Blankenhorn (of SMT PLUS) once wrote an article commenting on the 
IPC-SM-782 document. It was common sense type notes concerning several of 
the footprint dimensions in 782 that were questionable. I'm sure he would send 
you a copy if you call him. Personally, I have never heard a complaint about 
anything in the SMT Plus library, and I tend to trust someone who gives 
solutions based on 1000's of real-world assemblies rather than the ones decided 
"by committee"

> What are you doing as far as via's and conductors under SMD components? I
> noticed the P-Cad lib has keepouts under the chip components. I have been
> routing traces under SMD and have not had any problems.
> It has been quite awhile since I've even SEEN a PCAD library part (we make our 
own) and am kinda surprised about built-in keepouts. Several recent articles 
mention having to customize glue dispensing over traces in high volume 
assemblies so it might be good to speak to the assembler about it. But look at 
other boards; almost every design you see has traces under chip devices! From 
my experience vias are okay if they are tented, otherwise the inability to 
clean properly may cause early failure (from corrosion). 

> Silk Screen legend sizes seem to be very large on most commercial lib's
> compared to what I have been using. I seem to get away with .008 width and
> sometimes down to .060 height. What is your experience?
> For the last three companies I've worked at, 60high/8wide was typical, and 
50high for tight placements. One consideration about the width is that 8 looks 
crisp, very legible, but for higher volume the screen can get clogged, which 
will start leaving gaps.   

> I have just finished a Design for a client that demanded that all components
> be orientated in the same direction and also all of them lined up, nice and
> neat. Great idea if I would have had twice the board area to work with. I
> know the desireability of this but I also like to think form follows
> function. Many of the original reasons for doing this are obsolete. The
> board is finished now but I just know placing the parts for optimal routing
> would have resulted in much shorter runs, and a more functional layout. What
> is your opinion? How are you doing it?
>Tough question, because I sometimes can't help going for beauty if I have the 
time, the artist in me I guess... but not if the circuit is degraded. 
I think you might benefit from asking more questions up front just to 
understand the issues your customer/company is considering. Maybe they want 
your board to grace the cover of their new brochure, eh? 

> I also was prohibited from putting chip caps on the solder side, even though
> I routinely do it with other designs. Are any of you designing boards that
> are waved with chip caps on the solder side?
>Sometimes what would benefit you as a designer could cost the company a lot in 
the long run. Even if you only want to put a few components on the back, it 
complicates the assembly drawing and may affect training feild service manuals, 
parts may not be accessible after installation, Assemblers typically charge 
more automatically for double-sided boards and more steps are required, 
depending on the volume it might not be worth programming a pick-and-place 
machine for only a few parts on the backside which means those will have to be 
hand assembled; there are any number of reasons for making design decisions.
Again, you may want to start asking more questions...   
good luck
								Jack



ATOM RSS1 RSS2