DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uLTuE-0000CBC; Mon, 20 May 96 07:17 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<simon.ipc.org!bfgaero.com!bfgaero.com!larryc>
Date:
Mon, 20 May 96 8:07:14 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1723
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Message-ID:
<"qomhH1.0.j7G.fB6en"@ipc>
Subject:
flex design
From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Incognito-SN:
632
X-Incognito-Format:
VERSION=1.74 ENCRYPTED=NO
From [log in to unmask] Mon May 20 09:
37:01 1996
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
I'd like to know if there is a minimum dielectric thickness between layers of 
a double/multilayer flexe similar to the requirement for rigid boards in 
IPC-D-275?  I've looked through some of the flex specs (IPC-D-249, 
IPC-FC-231, IPC-FC-250) and haven't found anything that specifies a minimum. 
 I would appretiate any help in locating this information, if there is any.

Thank you,

Larry Campbell
BFGoodrich, Avionics Systems
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2