DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uJN3R-0000CeC; Tue, 14 May 96 11:34 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<simon.ipc.org!bfgaero.com!bfgaero.com!larryc>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 96 12:17:24 EDT
From [log in to unmask] Thu May 16 13:
07:39 1996
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1718
TO:
[log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Precedence:
list
Resent-Message-ID:
<"q8sKE.0.Zh2.OOBcn"@ipc>
X-Incognito-Format:
VERSION=1.74 ENCRYPTED=NO
From:
[log in to unmask]
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
minimum dielectric thickness of flexes
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Incognito-SN:
632
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
I'd like to know if there is a minimum dielectric thickness requirement for 
flexes similar to the requirement for rigid boards in IPC-D-275?  I've been 
looking through some of the flex specs (IPC-D-249, IPC-FC-231, IPC-FC-250) 
and haven't found anything that specifies a minimum.  I would appretiate any 
help in locating this information, if there is any.

Thank you,

Larry Campbell
BFGoodrich, Avionics Systems
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2