DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u9Y38-0000CdC; Wed, 17 Apr 96 09:17 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<buetmi>
Date:
Wed, 17 Apr 1996 09:17:34 -0500 (CDT)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
cc:
IPC Designers Council <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1618
TO:
"Wolfe, Robert" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
From [log in to unmask] Thu Apr 25 09:
49:24 1996
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"O8Vay.0.dLI.1sFTn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
In-Reply-To:
<31751DA3@MSMAIL>
Message-ID:
<Pine.3.89.9604170922.A44755-0100000@ipc>
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines)
Hi Bob,

I don't know of any design patterns for carbon inks. 

A concern is placement, due to the electrical characteristics of the carbon.
IPC-D-275, para. 5.5.3, specifies that conductive marking inks shall be 
permanent and isolated by spacing or coating from the balance of the 
circuitry.

Mike Buetow
IPC Tech Staff



ATOM RSS1 RSS2