DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:37:49 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
[log in to unmask] (DesignerCouncil), [log in to unmask] (sandman)
X-Status:
X-Conversion-Id:
<PU-NOTES.2171.829650988.20716>
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1609
TO:
[log in to unmask] (Charlene Dwyer)
From [log in to unmask] Mon Apr 22 16:
43:33 1996
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Status:
O
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u99xn-00006hC; Tue, 16 Apr 96 07:34 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"hXCnE1.0.nE8.MFvSn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Janice Lund)
Organization:
American Power Conversion, West Kingston, RI 02892 USA
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Mailer:
Lotus Notes via PostalUnion/SMTP for Windows NT
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Viewlogic was is Windows 95 or NT . It is not compatible with 3.1.


To: jlund <jlund @ apccorp.apcc.com> @ SMTP, DesignerCouncil <DesignerCouncil 
@ ipc.org> @ SMTP
cc: DesignerCouncil <DesignerCouncil @ ipchq.com> @ SMTP, sandman <sandman @ 
dobie.dsnet.com> @ SMTP 
From: Charlene Dwyer <cdwyer @ usr.com> @ SMTP
Date: 04/15/96 12:06:47 PM
Subject: Re[2]: CAD Evals

     I've heard that Viewlogic is not compatible with Windows 95.
     
     -Charlene Dwyer


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: CAD Evals
Author:  [log in to unmask] at Internet
Date:    4/11/96 7:44 PM


Veribest rox, take it from the very best....
     
Henry R. Linneweh
     
     
On Thu, 11 Apr 1996, Janice Lund wrote:
     
> I am looking into CAD tools and would like to hear feedback on some front end

> tools. We have narrowed it down to Viewlogic and VeriBest. 
> 
> 1. ease of use for schematic
> 2. ease of use for simulation tools - specifically Analog simulation 
> 3. productivity and speed of thruput - (given that the user is proficiently 
> knowledgeable and trained.
> 4. any other comments !!!
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance. 
> 
     


------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from apccorp.apcc.com by ns-inet.apcc.com
  (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.8d for Windows NT(tm))
  id AA-1996Apr15.120343.1563.101412; Mon, 15 Apr 1996 12:03:43 -0400
Received: from IPC.ORG by apccorp.apcc.com with SMTP
 (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA27857; Mon, 15 Apr 1996 12:04:10 -0400
Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
  id KAA20486; Mon, 15 Apr 1996 10:54:24 -0700
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 10:54:24 -0700
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
 id m0u7poE-00007DC; Fri, 12 Apr 96 15:51 CDT
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 96 15:17:00 CST
From: "Charlene Dwyer" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re[2]: CAD Evals
Resent-Message-Id: <"bdzo_.0.y_8.z8iRn"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1597
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]






ATOM RSS1 RSS2