TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kenneth R Kirby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 06 Dec 95 11:23:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (88 lines)

Text item: 

Sorry for leaving that bit a data out.  The board thickness for this 
lead length is .062.  This will allow the lead to protrude through the 
board .015 -.025 depending on board and lead leangth tolerance.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Clarification ; Solder balls
Author:  [log in to unmask] at SMTPGATE
Date:    12/4/95 11:24 PM


Could you please advise of lead length protruding through the bottom of the
pcb on the solder side? You mention lead lengths but do not clarify the
substrate thickness (ie how much of the lead contacts the solder wave)

thanks - D. Rooke
Circo Craft

>---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes --------------------------
-
>From: Kenneth R Kirby at HFCCM14
>Date: 12/1/95 8:40AM
>To: [log in to unmask] at Internet_Gateway
>Subject: Solder balls
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>I am not sure if this message went out so in case it bumped into an astroid
>while traveling through cyberspace I am resending.
>
>1. When wavesoldering with no-clean flux and nitrogen, solder balls seem
>to be a common problem.  While solder mask is part of the problem I have
>found that the lead length of connectors, sip's and other inline
>componets have the greatest effect on solder ball production.  By
>cutting the leads to .080-.085  from the standard length of .110-.120
>we can eliminate the solder balls. The problem is that you can not buy
>connectors and other components at the storter lead length.  The
>manufactures claim no one is asking for shorter leads.  I have not been
>able to find any documentation that backs up my claim. If you have the
>same requirement or have a article about lead length and solder balls
>please let me hear from you.
>
>
>2. IPC. Do you know about this?  Have you done any testing?  I believe
>that we need a lead length spec for the no-clean process.  Electrovert
>knows that this is a problem and so do most of the people I have talked
>with at the major flux companies. Can IPC help?
>
>
>

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1975
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Message-Id: <"z5Jg-3.0.EAI.dz1nm"@ipc>
Subject: Re: Clarification ; Solder balls
From: [log in to unmask] (denise rooke)
To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
X-Sender: [log in to unmask] (Unverified)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 23:24:05 -0500 (EST)
Old-Return-Path: <miso!accent.net!rooke>
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
     id m0tMueR-0000MnC; Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:31 CST
Received: from ipc by miso.wwa.com with uucp
     (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0tMwCg-000YKBC; Tue, 5 Dec 95 06:10 CST
Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 23:24:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from miso.wwa.com by hermes.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:1
1:32 -0800
Received: from hermes.intel.com by relay.hf.intel.com with smtp
     (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tMwDd-000qDOC; Tue, 5 Dec 95 04:11 PST



ATOM RSS1 RSS2