TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:58:12
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)

     Well Leo:
        Here is what we do. We have just purchased an Ionogragh which is 
     similar to an Omega Meter. Our process is setup to test a fab from 
     each water cleaning source (we currently have 2 SMT wash machines and 
     1 wave solder wash machine) every 4 hours. This will insure that if 
     any problems were to occur on any cleaning source we would know it 
     right away. We are using a closed loop recirculating Ionic removal 
     system to clean our water and all processes use water soluble 
     chemistries.
     
     Hope this helps ya.
     
     ERic Bernal Process Eng..


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Cleanliness testing with Omegameter as a contract manufactur
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ~INTERNET
Date:    10/21/95 11:03 AM


Received: by ccmail
Received:  from netcomsv by pragma.com (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
           Sat, 21 Oct 1995 11:02:21 PDT
Received: from miso.wwa.com by netcomsv.netcom.com with SMTP (8.6.12/SMI-4.1)
    id KAA21237; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 10:33:18 -0700
Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 10:33:18 -0700 
Received: from ipc by miso.wwa.com with uucp
    (Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0t6hnS-000iMTC; Sat, 21 Oct 95 12:33 CDT
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
    id m0t6gzB-0000GqC; Sat, 21 Oct 95 11:41 CDT
Old-Return-Path: <miso!ix.netcom.com!LEOT1> 
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 07:59:34 -0700
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> 
From: [log in to unmask] (Leo Reynolds )
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
Subject: Cleanliness testing with Omegameter as a contract manufacturer 
To: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Message-ID: <"BVOCb2.0.0gI.tAIYm"@ipc> 
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1480 
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
     
Technet
     
Our engineers are reviewing and updating process specs for our wave 
solder and cleaning operations.  We are a contract manufacturer doing 
primarily industrial and instrumentation products in a very wide variety 
of shapes, sizes and mix of SMT, PTH and some FPT as well as a great 
variety of mechanical parts including toroids, brackets, connectors etc. 
Volumes also vary greatly from prototype quantities to continous 
production.  Our main area of focus is our dual wave soldering area with 
aqueous cleaning.
     
We are primarily interested in developing the best process controls for 
measuring, recording and controling both wave solder and especially 
cleaning documentation that will satisfy us, ISO and our customers.
     
Our main question is, "With the variety we deal with, how often would we 
need to do Omegameter testing to feel assured our process is in control?"
     
Thank you in advance for your thoughts.
     
Best Regards,
     
Leo Reynolds
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2