TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Brian R Oatman)
Date:
Mon, 16 Oct 1995 19:34:11 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
I don't think anyone was discussing changing anything without conferring 
with the designer.

I'm not referring to you at all (I'm sure you would never do this)  but I 
have seen many designs for PCB's come down that are IMHO ridiculous, the 
designer obviously has never made a board and has little knowledge of what's 
manufacturable.  Not to get on a soapbox or go on a diatribe but if the 
designer would either confer with manufacturing or have an open mind when 
they get feed back everybody's job would be much more enjoyable.

brian



Mike previously wrote:
_________________________________________________________________
Kevin,

Use of non-functional lands is reccommended but  not mandatory 
per IPC-D-275 and Mil-STD-275. One other thing, I assumed you meant that
the design activity could remove them at their judgement and not the pwb
manufacturer. I would take great exception to a manufacturer taking it upon
himself to modify my design to simplify his process (although, in the 
true spirit of DFM, CE, etc., I am always open to reasonable, cost-saving 
ideas)

Mike

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Mike McNulty
Lockheed Martin GES
Moorestown NJ
Phone:(609)722-7323
Fax:(609)722-2207
[log in to unmask]
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


________________________________________________________





ATOM RSS1 RSS2