TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike McNulty <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Oct 1995 13:42:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)

Kevin,

Use of non-functional lands is reccommended but  not mandatory 
per IPC-D-275 and Mil-STD-275. One other thing, I assumed you meant that
the design activity could remove them at their judgement and not the pwb
manufacturer. I would take great exception to a manufacturer taking it upon
himself to modify my design to simplify his process (although, in the 
true spirit of DFM, CE, etc., I am always open to reasonable, cost-saving 
ideas)

Mike

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Mike McNulty
Lockheed Martin GES
Moorestown NJ
Phone:(609)722-7323
Fax:(609)722-2207
[log in to unmask]
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


________________________________________________________


The design guides for MIL-STD-275 and IPC-D-275 require non-functional pads 
on all layers of a multilayer PWB.  Can manufacturers remove them an their 
judgment?

If anyone knows the verse and script, that would be great.

Thank you in advance,
Kevin Thorson
Loral Defense Systems - Eagan




ATOM RSS1 RSS2