TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Augustine Li" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Aug 95 5:13:45 MDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
DOES THE NEW REVISION OF IPC-A-600 PENDING RELEASE BY SEPTEMBER ACCEPT 
EXPOSE COPPER AND TO WHAT EXTEND ?

AUGUSTINE 8/21

------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
To		: [log in to unmask],[log in to unmask]
Cc		: 
From		: [log in to unmask] (R_R_HOLMES)
Date		: Sunday, March 5, 1995  04:31:39 HKT 

AT&T allows exposed Cu on PWB's, and do not consider it a reliability 
threat. 
This issue has been a topic of some discussion with Bellcore who controls 
specifications for domestic tele-communications equipment.  They now 
accept 
the fact that exposed Cu is not a reliability threat.  One of the best 
papers 
on the subject was written by two Bellcore scientists:

"THE SURFACE COMPOSITION OF COPPER WITH INDOOR EXPOSURES RANGING FROM 3 TO 
49 
YEARS	;  Rudolf Schubert and Susan M. D'Egidio;  Corrosion Science, Vol 
30 
No 10 pp999-1008, 1990

Thia paper discusses the use of Ager spectrocopy to investigate surface 
films 
on copper bus bars that had been installed as early as 1939.  They found 
films 
of 10 to 100 nanometers.  These films differ chemically and in thickness 
from 
fils formed in accelerated atmosphere corrosion chambers.

I hope this reference is of use.
 
R. R. Holmes
AT&T

------------- Begin Original Message -------------
Message-Version: 2
From: maxtor.com!Simon_Li 
Date: Tue Feb 21 22:32:15 MST 95
Received: from attme by attme.cnet.att.com; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 11:40 EST
Received: from att!wwa.com!ipc!ipchq.com by ig2.att.att.com id AA25763; 
Wed, 
22 Feb 95 11:39:25 EST
Received: by gw1.att.com; Wed Feb 22 11:31:54 EST 1995
Received: from ipc by gagme.wwa.com with uucp
Received: (Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0rhK1G-000FEhC; Wed, 22 Feb 95 10:34 CST
Received: by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
Received: id m0rhJRW-0000GiC; Wed, 22 Feb 95 09:57 CST
End-of-Header: 
Email-Version: 2
Subject: copper expose
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 95 22:32:15 MST
Old-Return-Path: <gagme!maxtor.com!Simon_Li>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
X-Incognito-Sn: 368
X-Incognito-Format: VERSION=1.60g ENCRYPTED=NO
Resent-Message-Id: <"uk8RW1.0.Au7.jxrIl"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/221
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Original-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
UA-Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
End-of-Protocol: 
Content-Type: text     
Content-Length: 138      

Did anyone have any idea where I could find any article or reference about 
the copper expose on the PCB (GOOD OR BAD) ? 

thanks



ATOM RSS1 RSS2