TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 15 Aug 95 10:37:28 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
From: Kelly Kovalovsky, Raw Card Quality Engineering                           
Phone:704-595-7336 Tie Line:795-7336 FAX Ext. 4727                             
Subject: 0.020" pitch SMT pad widths                                           
                                                                               
We design our 0.020" pitch SMT pads at an 0.011" pad width. Our                
specification calls for these pads to finish at 0.011" +/- 0.002" as           
measured at the laminate.                                                      
                                                                               
The problem is that the pads tend to come in at 0.0085" to 0.0095" at          
the top of the pad due to etch factor. Our SMT paste screens are               
manufactured at 0.011" nominal. It is the dimension at the top of the          
pad that is important to the card assembler. We have requested that            
the raw boards be built to meet 0.011" +/- 0.002" as measured at the           
top of the pad. This involves compensating the artwork to meet our             
requirement.                                                                   
                                                                               
My questions to the raw board manufacturers are:                               
                                                                               
1) Is 0.011" +/- 0.002" as measured at the top of a 0.020" pitch pad a         
manufacturable feature at an acceptable yield?                                 
                                                                               
2) If so, what comp factor would you use to achieve this finished              
dimension?                                                                     
                                                                               
3) Does board finish (HASL, entek, etc.) put any limitations on your           
ability to manufacture this?                                                   
                                                                               
IBM Microelectronics Division                                                  
6800 IBM Drive MG12/251                                                        
Charlotte, NC  28262-8563                                                      



ATOM RSS1 RSS2