TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Michael Alderete" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Aug 95 10:41:04 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
     Bob-
     
     See also
     
     "Chip Scale Packaging," SMT Magazine, May 1995, pp.45-48, by Phil 
     Marcoux of ChipScale Inc., San Jose CA (408)955-9180
     
     "Development of the Slightly larger than IC carrier (SLICC)," Proc. 
     NEPCON West 1994, pp.1249-1256, Kingshuk Banerji of Motorola.  
     -Banerji's paper gives a good description of what is essentially a 
     type of CSP, comparing the package area ratio to other Moto processes, 
     including OMPAC, BGA, COB, DCA C4: all have a greater area ratio than 
     the SLICC (.060"pitch OMPAC/SLICC = 2.56/1.0).
     Banerji also discusses some reliability and board assembly issues.
     
     [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: chip-scale attachement
Author:  [log in to unmask] at _internet
Date:    8/10/95 2:52 PM


To whom---
     
I hate to clutter up the "EMPLOYMENT PAGE" with a need/interest of a technical 
nature, but can someone give me an overview (50 words or less) on chip scale 
devices and their attachement to the pwb. I think they are,simplistically,
a coated chip with a ball grid attachement scheme. Further insight would be 
appreciated. Much thanks in advance.
     
                                       Bob [log in to unmask]
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2