Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0syIYz-0000HXC; Thu, 28 Sep 95 07:59 CDT |
Lines: |
30 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 09:51:59 GMT |
Precedence: |
list |
Reply-To: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"L5j0P1.0.GHD.hmfQm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
54:14 1996 |
Resent-From: |
|
X-Mailer: |
PCElm 1.10 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In message <[log in to unmask]> Glynn Shaw writes:
> I have been following the recent thread relating to temperature stickers and
> contacted the supplier of Templaq mentioned by John Crawford. Templaq is
> geared for assembly rework and is not available in a temperature setting to
> suite my requirements.
>
> My question is this:
> Does anyone know of a temperature-indicating ink which might be screened or
> otherwise applied to boards during manufacture and whose purpose is to
> "ballpark" the highest temperatures seen during assembly, or to indicate
> that the board has exceeded a known temperature during assembly?
Perhaps this would be a good opportunity to establish the temperature range and
accuracy which is generally required for IR reflow profiling. Temperature
stickers, crayons, etc are available from a number of suppliers, but what
range is needed?
What is lowest temperature needed to be sensed?
What is highest temperature needed to be sensed?
What increments are needed? 1 degree, 5 degree, 10 degree?
I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
Peter Swanson Oxfordshire, England
[log in to unmask] Compuserve: 100120,3641
Time is an illusion perpetuated by the manufacturers of space.
I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
|
|
|