Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sWSZB-0000GoC; Thu, 13 Jul 95 13:00 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!aol.com!SIRGuru> |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 1995 13:47:48 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"RqX0i2.0.u6G.JzL1m"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
23:25 1996 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In addition to these comments, with which I agree, I would say that you can
expect the boards to be much more porous, with more of the bromide fire
retardant extractable. This would show up in Omegameter testing or ion
chromatography.
Doug Pauls
Contamination Studies Laboratories
|
|
|