 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sJT8x-0000GnC; Wed, 7 Jun 95 17:00 CDT |
| Encoding: |
11 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!ATK.COM!ehare> |
| Date: |
Wed, 07 Jun 95 16:27:00 PDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13: |
53:56 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vqhuz2.0.hi9.b5Yrl"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are investigating manual soldering operations using low residue flux
(LRF). Does anyone have any experience with lead tinning and/or tinning of
stranded wire using adipic acid based LRF? Our initial attempts yielded
poor results compared with RMA flux. Also, we were told by at least one LRF
vendor that LRF is inherently poor (due to low solids content) for lead
tinning. Any comments would be sincerely appreciated.
Ed Hare
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
