TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sId8M-0000GoC; Mon, 5 Jun 95 09:28 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!lut.ac.uk!D.C.Whalley>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jun 95 10:46:04 bst
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/569
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13:
53:41 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"8PHim3.0.0f5.iHnql"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
David Christopher Whalley <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> Does any one know a test for measuring the degree of cure for solder resists
that works and provides a useful measurement.

One of our students recently looked at this without much luck. He found
some correlation between the IPC/BS pencil hardness test and tests with
the "more scientific" Vickers micro-hardness test, but the Vickers test
proved tricky to get quatative results from (perhaps more sophisticated
micro hardness equipment would help). It is difficult to prepare DSC
test samples that are representative of manufacturing conditions - if 
you cut out a small peice of coated board the results are dominated by
the PCB properties - I had wondered about printing onto something like
PTFE & then peeling of the film for testing (how are you preparing your
samples Bob?). Differential Photo Calorimetry might be an alternative.

David Whalley



ATOM RSS1 RSS2