TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tPx8U-0000MtC; Wed, 13 Dec 95 13:46 CST
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!hou.Sperry-Sun.COM!DDrake_at_SSDSRDCC>
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 1995 13:35:13 -0600
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/420
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
29:31 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"NYg6A1.0.2tJ.Rsopm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
     Does anyone have any personal experience with "image switching 
     comparators" such as Vision Engineering's "comparascope". In a visual 
     inspection process are there any substiantial benefits for this 
     technique. 
     
     Any comments?
     
     DDrake
     Lead Process Engineer - SSDS
     (713) 987-4365
     DRAKE@SSDSRDCC



ATOM RSS1 RSS2