TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tPcDj-0000MTC; Tue, 12 Dec 95 15:26 CST
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!pc.Trimble.COM!SBANKS.MFG>
Date:
Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:59 PST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/408
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
28:32 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"5sjS02.0.DYB.7EVpm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Sherman Banks)
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I have a question about reflow soldering to gold with 2% silver paste.

I heard some  folk lore at our company about using 2% silver solder paste 
on gold plated lands. The legend states that 62/36/2 paste on gold has 
long term reliability implications, these joints being subject to 
dendritic growth to a greater degree than 63/37 solder to gold.

If anyone is aware of published data on this subject, I would be very 
grateful if you would give me the references so I may review the 
information.

Also, if anyone is using silver solder on gold at this time, I would be 
interested in hearing about your experience.

Please respond by the technet, to my e-mail address 
([log in to unmask]) or my phone (408/481-6047)
Thanks and regards
Sherman Banks





ATOM RSS1 RSS2