TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!telecomm.tadiran.co.il!mickey>
Date:
Thu, 7 Dec 1995 17:33:15 +0200 (IST)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/367
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
26:24 1996
X-Sender:
mickey@neptune
TO:
IPC Technical Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"yBTTH2.0.nRM.-Wnnm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Mickey Weiner (2937)" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Sender:
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tNjK3-0000M1C; Thu, 7 Dec 95 10:37 CST
Message-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.951207112410.3849B-100000@neptune>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)

    We are interested in actual design rules for via-in-pad utilization:
    1) Should we modify existing pad size?  
    2) Where would you place the via (assuming 12 mil hole) in a soic
       pad: towards the edge of the pad or in the center.
    3) Would you limit (or rather balance) the number of holes on each
       side of a soic?   
    4) having a component on top side with vias-in-pads, should we  
       limit  the size of the pad on the bottom side?
    5) Should we cover, on bottom side, all via holes which connect to 
       smt pads on top side, with ssolder mask?  
    6) Isn't there a chance of "volcano effect" that will result in
       a void underneath the component terminal when going through
       the wave soldering?   
    7) Is it recommended to change to a harder (metal) squeegee? 

    Thanks in advance for any response

  Michael Weiner
  [log in to unmask] 




ATOM RSS1 RSS2