Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tMGwX-0000LuC; Sun, 3 Dec 95 10:07 CST |
Encoding: |
93 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!pcsmtp.lcec.lockheed.com!sethier> |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Dec 95 09:27:40 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
24:12 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"7opRj1.0.DCL.jiSmm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Topline (310-433-7000)offers a tape splicer that may help although I
can't personnally vouch for it's effectiveness.
steve ethier
Lockheed Martin Commercial Electronics
603-885-8432
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Splicing of SMT component tape
Author: [log in to unmask] at 0UTG0ING
Date: 12/1/95 3:25 PM
Received: by ccmail from marble.litc.lockheed.com
>From [log in to unmask]
X-Envelope-From: [log in to unmask]
Received: from miso.wwa.com (miso.wwa.com [198.49.174.33]) by
marble.litc.lockheed.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA13959; Fri, 1 Dec 1995
12:34:13 -0800
Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 12:34:13 -0800
Received: from ipc by miso.wwa.com with uucp
(Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0tLc1k-000YLiC; Fri, 1 Dec 95 14:25 CST
Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tLazg-0000MOC; Fri, 1 Dec 95 13:19 CST
Old-Return-Path: <miso!empf.nawc-ad-indy.navy.mil!crawfoj>
From: "Crawford, John A." <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Splicing of SMT component tape
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 95 13:48:00 EST
Message-ID: <30BF06FC@MSMAIL-GTWY>
Encoding: 54 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Resent-Message-ID: <"8nQSa1.0.52A.5Lrlm"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1953
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Following from the EMPF HelpLine in Indianpolis, prepared by Pat Kane:
I would call one of the several "reeling" services that do custom reeling of
components. Two company names I have are:
Advantek Inc.
581 Clearwater Dr.
Minnetonka, MN 55343
612-938-6800
Lightner Automation Inc.
441 Carpenter Ave.
Wheeling, Il 60090
708-215-8888
These two vendors supply tape, reels, and custom reeling. If they cannot
resolve the problem with supplies or information, they could probably come
up with another vendor who could in their industry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: TechNet-request
To: TECHNET
Subject: Splicing of SMT component tape
Date: 29 Nov 95 11:05AM
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 22:33:12 -0500
Old-Return-Path: <miso!ix.netcom.com!LEOT1>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:05:58 -0800
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask] (Leo Reynolds )
Subject: Splicing of SMT component tape
To: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Message-ID: <"B3Fnf.0.7dF.fRDlm"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1910
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>From time to time, we split reels of SMT taped components so that we can
run the same part on two or three pick & place machines. Of course this
only occurs on small or end of run projects where there is only one reel
of parts available.
Our question is, Are there splicing systems available for attaching
leaders on the cut end of the reels to eliminate parts loss?
Thanks,
Leo Reynolds
Electronic Systems, Inc.
|
|
|