TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sF5Ug-0000GnC; Fri, 26 May 95 14:56 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!nicmad.nicolet.com!nicmad.nicolet.com!mcguine>
Date:
Fri, 26 May 1995 14:37:43 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/554
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13:
51:09 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"tSaeE.0.ks5.d9Znl"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Pat McGuine)
X-Sender:
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
<PC Eudora Version 1.1a10>
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
We have been using a Camalot 1818 with a rotary displacement pump and a 
mechanical Z-axis compensator for about four years and have never had a problem.


At 08:35 AM 5/26/95 -0700, Leo Reynolds wrote:
>We're a contract manufacturer with two surface mount lines looking at 
>adding some new dispensing equipment.  We have several Camelot's, 
>including a 1414 purchased within the last year.
>
>My question is, since the price of this equipment seems to be going up 
>dramatically, are there newer, better options for dispensing adhesive 
>for bottom side SMT?  Are there other suppliers that have any unique 
>process or equipment solutions?
>
>Thanks in advance for any comments you might have.
>
>Leo Reynolds
>
>
>
-Pat-

-------------
Patrick McGuine
[log in to unmask]
(608) 276-6334



ATOM RSS1 RSS2