 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tKuUd-0000mqC; Wed, 29 Nov 95 15:56 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!BayNetworks.COM!Sunny_Ghajar> |
| Date: |
29 Nov 1995 19:04:47 GMT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
22:13 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"f5zK6.0.KvK.HSDlm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Reply-To: |
|
| Organization: |
Bay Networks |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like to get some feedback from the assembly houses on their experience
with vias placed within SMT pads. What are the typical designs that you see..
What about larger via sizes.. Are there ways to make the process more
efficient..
Please forward your thoughts.
Sunny Ghajar
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
